Background and Development of SI
– The SI system was developed over 170 years between 1791 and 1960.
– The SI system was based on the principles of logic and natural phenomena.
– The metre was defined as one ten-millionth of the distance from the north pole to the equator.
– The kilogram was defined as the mass of one thousandth of a cubic metre of pure water.
– Realizations of the units were created, such as the mètre des Archives and kilogramme des Archives.
– The French National Constituent Assembly introduced the new system of measurement during the French Revolution.
– The metre and kilogram definitions chosen were not practical for everyday use.
– Realizations were created, such as the mètre des Archives and kilogramme des Archives.
– By 1875, the metric system had become widespread in Europe and Latin America.
– Technological advances since 1960 allowed for addressing weaknesses in the SI system.
2019 Redefinition of SI Base Units
– In 2019, four of the seven SI base units were redefined in terms of natural physical constants.
– The kilogram, ampere, kelvin, and mole were redefined using exact numerical values for physical constants.
– The Planck constant, elementary electric charge, Boltzmann constant, and Avogadro constant were used in the redefinition.
– The redefinition aimed to improve the SI system without changing the value of any units.
– The redefinition was unanimously approved by the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures.
Previous Changes in the Metric System
– The previous major change in the metric system occurred in 1960 with the formal publication of the SI.
– The definition of the metre was changed to be derived from natural phenomena.
– The kilogram remained defined by a physical prototype, making it the only artifact-dependent unit.
– The SI was constructed around seven base units, with powers used to construct other units.
– The 2019 redefinition allowed for all units to be constructed directly from defining constants.
Criticisms of the Redefined SI Units
– Some authors have published criticisms of the revised definitions.
– Criticisms include the impact of breaking the link between the dalton and the kilogram, mole, and Avogadro constant.
– The proposal failed to address this impact according to critics.
– The previous definitions of some units were difficult to precisely realize in a laboratory.
– The 2019 redefinition made the SI wholly derivable from natural phenomena.
Notable Points
– The SI system was based on the principles of logic and natural phenomena.
– Realizations of the units were created, such as the mètre des Archives and kilogramme des Archives.
– Technological advances since 1960 allowed for addressing weaknesses in the SI system.
– The redefinition aimed to improve the SI system without changing the value of any units.
– The redefinition was unanimously approved by the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures.
– The 2019 redefinition made the SI wholly derivable from natural phenomena. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_redefinition_of_SI_base_units
In 2019, four of the seven SI base units specified in the International System of Quantities were redefined in terms of natural physical constants, rather than human artifacts such as the standard kilogram. Effective 20 May 2019, the 144th anniversary of the Metre Convention, the kilogram, ampere, kelvin, and mole are now defined by setting exact numerical values, when expressed in SI units, for the Planck constant (h), the elementary electric charge (e), the Boltzmann constant (kB), and the Avogadro constant (NA), respectively. The second, metre, and candela had previously been redefined using physical constants. The four new definitions aimed to improve the SI without changing the value of any units, ensuring continuity with existing measurements. In November 2018, the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) unanimously approved these changes, which the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM) had proposed earlier that year after determining that previously agreed conditions for the change had been met. These conditions were satisfied by a series of experiments that measured the constants to high accuracy relative to the old SI definitions, and were the culmination of decades of research.


The previous major change of the metric system occurred in 1960 when the International System of Units (SI) was formally published. At this time the metre was redefined: the definition was changed from the prototype of the metre to a certain number of wavelengths of a spectral line of a krypton-86 radiation, making it derivable from universal natural phenomena. The kilogram remained defined by a physical prototype, leaving it the only artifact upon which the SI unit definitions depend. At this time the SI, as a coherent system, was constructed around seven base units, powers of which were used to construct all other units. With the 2019 redefinition, the SI is constructed around seven defining constants, allowing all units to be constructed directly from these constants. The designation of base units is retained but is no longer essential to define the SI units.
The metric system was originally conceived as a system of measurement that was derivable from unchanging phenomena, but practical limitations necessitated the use of artifacts – the prototype of the metre and prototype of the kilogram – when the metric system was introduced in France in 1799. Although it was designed for long-term stability, the masses of the prototype kilogram and its secondary copies have shown small variations relative to each other over time; they are not thought to be adequate for the increasing accuracy demanded by science, prompting a search for a suitable replacement. The definitions of some units were defined by measurements that are difficult to precisely realise in a laboratory, such as the kelvin, which was defined in terms of the triple point of water. With the 2019 redefinition, the SI became wholly derivable from natural phenomena with most units being based on fundamental physical constants.
A number of authors have published criticisms of the revised definitions; their criticisms include the premise that the proposal failed to address the impact of breaking the link between the definition of the dalton and the definitions of the kilogram, the mole, and the Avogadro constant.